Abstract :
Background: Tubal patency significantly impacts female infertility, with a substantial portion of cases linked to tubal damage. This hinders gamete and embryo transfer. While laparoscopic chromo-pertubation is the gold standard, its invasiveness prompts the search for alternatives. Common methods for assessing tubal health are Hysterosalpingography (HSG) and Hysterosalpingo Contrast Sonography (HyCoSy).
Objective: The objective of this study is to assess and compare the efficacy of a budget-friendly 2D/3D HyCoSy method using a unique contrast agent with traditional HSG for diagnosing tubal patency in women with infertility issues.
Materials and Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted within a single clinical setting over a five-year duration. A total of 117 infertile women underwent assessment using both the 2D/3D HyCoSy and HSG techniques.
Results: Participants had a mean age of 27.7 years (standard deviation: 4.2, range: 19-45 years). The diagnostic accuracy of 2D/3D HyCoSy was determined with a sensitivity of 91.86%, specificity of 89.18%, a positive predictive value of 90.40%, and a negative predictive value of 90.82%. Comparative analysis revealed that when evaluating tubal patency in both tubes collectively with HyCoSy, the sensitivity, specificity, and overall accuracy were 91.86%, 89.18%, and 90.59%, respectively.
Conclusions: The study findings demonstrated that employing 2D/3D HyCoSy with lignocaine gel proved to be a superior diagnostic approach compared to HSG for assessing tubal patency in women experiencing infertility.
Keyword :
Hysterosalpingo contrast sonography, Lignocaine gel, Hysterosalpingography, Tubal patency, Infertility.