Unstable Intertrochanteric Fractures: Hemiarthroplasty V/S Fixation


Article PDF :

Veiw Full Text PDF

Article type :

Null

Author :

Zulfikar M. Patel, Shaival S. Dalal, Kalpesh A. Mehta, Akash J. Shah

Volume :

1

Issue :

1

Abstract :

Background and Objectives: For many decades, attempts have been made to overcome the difficulties which surgeons encounter in the treatment of proximal femoral fractures. Extra medullary and intramedullary implants have improved in recent years, although consensus is lacking concerning the definition and classification of unstable intertrochanteric fractures, with uncertainties regarding treatment. In this era of technologically sound and tested fixation methods we shall compare functional outcomes and complications of various methods available for unstable it fracture fixation. The purpose of this study is to analyze the role of primary hemi arthroplasty in cases of unstable osteoporotic intertrochanteric femur fractures and compare the outcomes with conventional fixation techniques to find out a better management plan for the patient. Materials and Methods: This is a prospective study of fifty cases of unstable intertrochanteric fractures, either treated with primary replacement (hemi or total) or fixation. Between February 2012 and December 2012, fifty patients with an unstable comminuted intertrochanteric femoral fracture (AO/OTA type 31A2.2, A2.3, A3.2, A3.3) were enrolled in the study, which was approved by our institutional review board. Inclusion Criteria:  1.        More than 60 years of age.  2.        All patients with unstable IT femur fracture type a.        31- A2.2 and 31- A2.3 (AO/OTA classification) b.        Posteromedial fragmentation c.        Basicervical d.        Reverse oblique e.        Displaced greater trochanter (lateral wall fractures) f.         Patient must be ambulatory before sustaining injury  Exclusion Criteria: a.        Chronically debilitated and bed ridden patients. b.        Compound fracture  c.        Medically compromised patients- ASA grade iv &v  d.        Local infection ¾ Stable fracture Results: Maximum patients (88%) belonged to 60-80 years of age. Since most of the patient belong to elderly age group, medical comorbidities are very common. Average requirement of blood transfusion needed was significantly higher in hemi replacement group than in fixation group. (Z= 3.56, p