Abstract :
In the Indonesian constitution it is stated that the State of Indonesia is a state of law, this is evidenced by the existence of a State Administrative Court which aims to prevent abuse of the authority of public officials, but the implementation of the PTUN decisions does not yet have firmness because there is no coercive effort for public officials who are declared wrong in implementing the policy. The purpose of this study is to analyze and explain the regulations as well as the execution of the decisions of the State Administrative Court that apply in Indonesia and analyze the weaknesses that affect the execution of the decisions of the State Administrative Court. The method in this is non-doctrinal, using primary data obtained by conducting interviews and secondary data by conducting a literature study, the results of the research are then analyzed using qualitative descriptive methods. Because Law Number 51 of 2009 concerning the State Administrative Court confirms not to carry out the execution of the PTUN decision. The weakness lies in the legal substance of Article 97 number (9) of the Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 51 of 2009 concerning the State Administrative Court, which has not regulated threats to officials who do not carry out the provisions as stated in the decision of the State Administrative Court. And the weakness in Article 116 has not regulated the amount of forced money sanctions. While the legal structure factor is the absence of further legal remedies because the implementation of the PTUN decision depends on the awareness of the relevant officials. These weaknesses have led to a loss of public confidence in the PTUN decision, so it is necessary to reconstruct Article 97 point (9) and Article 116 of the Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 51 of 2009 concerning the State Administrative Court.
Keyword :
Execution, administrative court, decision, reconstruction, law